MonkeyVikings Twerts
  • Sabin DensmoreNeed some resources on how to deal with people who want to hold on to their "Knowledge Manager" role in the face of community-based KM - posted on Aug 25, 2010 16:10
  • Sabin Densmoreentering next phase. North to #vermont for a #telecommute experiment. - posted on Aug 14, 2010 12:49
  • Sabin Densmorenot satisfied with #google response to net neutrality issue and am swearing off their products/services until I am. - posted on Aug 12, 2010 22:30

August 5, 2010

Transition

I was thinking about writing some philosophical treatise and/or diatribe here on the nature of our lives and transition, but it turns out I don’t know what to say just yet. The short — or “TL;DR”, if you will — version is that a life without transition is a stagnant existence. One that we can not actually perceive as real and valid in the sense that we would normally use those words. Transitions from one point to another are what define motion, so without them we can’t actually be sure we’re moving — either metaphysically or physically. So that’s the primary point. The rest of the post was going to be about how to engage moments of transition in such a way that we can better determine which direction our motion takes us, but I haven’t fleshed that out entirely. More later.

Filed under: thoughts — Sabin @ 08:59

August 4, 2010

Twitter roll!

Well, I’ve adopted the @twitter as a method of communication, but since this blog is my main communication center, I want to make sure all streams come through here. To that end, I used a nice little WordPress plugin called Xhanch to do it. If you’re using WordPress, I would definitely encourage you to check it out.

I’m planning on using it on a certain website I’m building, too.

Filed under: thoughts — Sabin @ 14:59

June 25, 2010

Occupado

I’m going to split the topics of the post into two groups. The latter is the most important and is regarding whether the events in our lives happen for a reason or if they’re just random occurrences. Unfortunately, the first topic of this post is one I’ve written on before: my own lack of consistency in updating these pages. It’s been I-don’t-know-how-long since my last post, so I’ll just start this one with an update or two.

  1. I’ve moved onegecko.com to a new server that I have more control over. Details of the reasons and what’s behind the move can be inferred by visiting www.sherbertia.com.
  2. The 2010 World Cup has taken up most of my time, but it probably has for most of the rest of you, as well.
  3. Lastly, I’ve been busy helping out a friend with her website. I’ll post details of that once it launches.

So, here endeth the excuses. Now for the reason I’m writing.

If you’re reading this, you’ve been told at some point in your life — probably at a profoundly tragic moment — that everything “happens for a reason”. Ostensibly, of course, this means that whatever it is you’re dealing with at that moment will be the cause of something else in the future. The statement is supposed to make us feel better. As though understanding why something happens is a kind of solace. A friend of mine has been noodling with this theme in some of his writing — which by the way is quite good so I hope he keeps going — so I’ve started to toss it around in my noggin as well. There are a number of paths to take in the discussion, but I’ll let him be the master of that journey. As for me it’s quite simple. It doesn’t matter why something happens. What matters is what you do next.

When my mother died, I found no solace in the typical “it’s all for a reason” argument. I knew the reason. Her diabetes got the best of her. The question that needed to be answered was “what next?”. In fact, the job of life is to consistently answer that question for ourselves. Lose your job? What are you going to do about it? Made a bad decision and got into a fight? Jail? What will you do next? The answer we find to the question of what next is what defines us for that moment. It’s what ultimately provides the foundation for all other decisions moving forward. Reputations are won and lost by the history of our answers to the question.

Is it important to try and understand the reason behind an event in our life? It might be. It is more important, however, to step forward into the aftermath of that event and try to figure out what to do next. A profoundly difficult task to say the least, but the comfort we can garner from taking affirmative and positive action is far greater than that provided by the answer to the weaker question of why.

Filed under: thoughts — Sabin @ 14:22

May 12, 2010

Racism runs rampant

I abhor racism. The idea that any one person is better or worse than another simply because of skin color or cultural differences is and always has been absurd. Just as absurd is the idea that culture can’t or shouldn’t be shared amongst disparate groups of people. I have no patience for any propaganda that supports the ascension of  one group at the expense of another. I used to think that my need for this spite and abhorrence would be able to slowly ebb as societies became more understanding and tolerant of one another, as groups within those societies became more tolerant of one another. I’m afraid I was mistaken.

Racism is in fact still strong in America. The perpetual separation of groups by color, culture and language remains a significant part of our culture. The transition of distrust and hatred from blacks to asians to the middle-eastern to hispanics and back again is perpetually enacted. We are supposed to be a country of open-armed tolerance. A beacon of hope to the world.

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
‘ With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

We’ve never been perfect, but the desire has always been there for most of us. We should have learned by now, though. Italians, Germans, Irish, Chinese, Polish, Jewish, Japanese, Vietnamese, and now Mexicans. When is it going to end? I propose it ends now, and I’ve got some ideas for how to settle what appear on the surface to be issues about immigration but are in reality about racism.

  1. Those people here illegally should be allowed to apply for work visas or citizenship immediately with no fear of repercussions.
  2. America should never declare a national language, culture, or religion. Our identity is in our liberty and openness, not in the way we speak or how we choose — or choose not — to worship.
  3. All racist ideas need to stop. Now. If you judge a culture by the actions of a few individuals, you’re racist. Knock it off.
  4. No American or guest of this country should be forced to produce identification or proof of residence unless there is a felony potential.
  5. All laws that raise up one culture over another should be repealed.
  6. Stop focusing on one culture per month. How about making sure our history books are accurate rather than highlight or diminish the accomplishments of one culture at a time?
  7. Learn. From. Our. Mistakes.

That should do it.

Filed under: thoughts — Sabin @ 18:19

April 18, 2010

It’s a good day

It’s not so often lately that I can say I’ve had or am having a good day. Today is fortunately one of those times. Not even the random and close-minded religious ramblings from facebook-game friends can dampen the spirits in the apartment.

The rain clouds are starting to break up and the barest hints of naked sky are visible above the trees. The pets seem content and are lolligagging at the deck door, enjoying the streaming light. My daughter swings here next to me, the lullaby sounds of gentle music accompanying the rhythmic click-click of the swing’s mechanism. Every once in awhile she’ll peer up at me but then resumes her chore of grabbing at the toy I’ve put near her. My son spends some well-deserved time playing Warcraft. It’s  hard to understand him lately. The tween-aged boy psychology is something I’m not terribly good at figuring out yet. Today, though, it’s going well. Someday soon I’m sure he’ll be able to best me at sparring, but so far I’m ahead on points.

My wife is connecting with unknown family members on Facebook to try and learn more about ancestry, and as for me: I’m just typing and making sure to stay on top of my virtual city.

It’s a good day, though. And so far I’ll take it.

Filed under: thoughts — Tags: — Sabin @ 14:13

Rune Explorations: Fehu

FEHU (FAY-hoo) is the first rune of the three rows or Aetts of the Elder Futhark. The word FEHU comes from the Proto-Germanic and is the origin of our modern word “fee”.

The literal and pictographic representation of FEHU is the domesticated cattle. Cattle were often used to pay debts, settle disputes, and establish other types of trade. The use of cattle in this way is documented in Tactitus’ “Germania” (Germania 12.80) as a way of paying societal or criminal fines.  The rune still brings to mind that kind of association we have with “fee”: the stuff we use to pay our debts and obligations. Though sought after and valued as a means to an end, this is not the kind of wealth you want to focus on for your entire life.

FEHU represents money and the problems caused by valuing it above all else. “Money is kinsmen’s quarrel,” the rune poem says. “Path of grave-magic,” it continues, then “fire of the sea” or “flood-tide’s token”. Retrieving the wealth FEHU describes can require a dangerous and strife-filled path if we’re not careful. The Anglo-Saxon poem says it’s better to give it out if you have it. The Havamal and many of the sagas support this opinion.

The Havamal says (trans. Carolyne Larrington):

Generous and brave men live the best,
seldom do they harbor anxiety;
but the cowardly man is afraid of everything,
the miser always sighs when he receives gifts

Even a man who knows nothing
knows that many are fooled by money;
one man is rich, another is not rich,
he should not be blamed for that.

Cattle die, kinsmen die,
the self must also die;
I know one thing which never dies:
the reputation of each dead man.

Fully stocked folds I saw for Fituing’s sons,
now they carry beggar’s staffs;
wealth is like the twinkling of an eye,
it is the most unreliable of friends.

I believe that FEHU should not be used to represent some kind of originating force or essence. It’s connection with monetary wealth and the dangers of same are so obvious that the esoteric leap to originating force seems to me a stretch. To call it also an originating force of the universe (as Edred Thorsson does), we are in essence saying that the origins of our universe are connected to money. Disposable cash. If FEHU is a beginning or originating force, it may be as the means to undertake a journey, but not as the journey itself, and certainly not as some primal force.

It is significant that FEHU is the first rune and OTHALA — the rune representing homestead, hearth, permanent home — is the last. FEHU is the beginning of the journey. The hacksilver in your pocket or on your wrist that gets you from one place to another. It’s your cab fare, bill money, the stuff you need on hand in order to make ends meet. It’s never the end goal, however. It’s just your first step. A head of cattle aren’t worth much if you’ve got no farm on which to feed them, an old Norse philosopher might say.

So with FEHU  must come the understanding that a quest for money for its own sake is foolish and possibly dangerous (“grave-magic” and the story of Fafnir’s gold come to mind). Goals in life should be broader, farther-reaching, and have more personal and societal impact than simply wanting to accumulate disposable wealth. Money is fleeting, the Havamal tells us. It’s best not to rely on it more than necessary. Perhaps FEHU is a fitting rune for us to meditate on even — or perhaps especially — in the 21st century. FEHU is the money itself, the advice on how to use it best, and a warning against greed.

Filed under: philosophy,runes — Tags: , , , — Sabin @ 01:10

March 31, 2010

Elder Futhark and Runic thinking

I’ve been studying the runes for almost 20 years now. I was in my freshman year of high school when I first stumbled across these mysterious symbols as I was doing research for a chemistry paper: a picture of a Viking-era sword whose blade was etched with a combination of “Isa”, “Nauthiz”, and “Tiwaz”. I didn’t know that at the time, of course. All I knew was that they called to me. Reached out to me from that CD-ROM and dared me to understand what it meant. I’ve done what I could over the past 20 years to answer that dare.

During that period of time I’ve seen many ebbs and flows in the direction of the studies of the masses into runes and rune-lore. I’ve tried some of them on, and dismissed others out-of-hand. From those chintzy pewter necklaces based on the Blum book in the eighties, to the quasi-neo-nazi symbolistic revival of Asatru as the “true religion”, to the scholarly advances of Edred Thorsson and everything in between. While I wouldn’t say that every attempt has been without merit, not one attempt has contained enough real truth for my satisfaction.

If you’re reading this and are close to the study of rune-lore, this is where you will point out that since we have so few primary source materials about the original study of runes, we will never come close to the truth. Maybe you’ll say that what we have is a good enough approximation that we can get by with it. I won’t disagree with you outright. I will challenge, however, that out of all of those attempts, little has been done to relate our studies of runes to the daily culture of the originators. That’s not to say we haven’t accounted for differences in semantic meanings, but I believe we’ve not come very far in understanding and then transposing original meanings into contemporary culture.

For example, fehu’s meaning as money, mobile wealth, cattle is certain. We have reference to as much within the runic poems, the etymology of the word “fee” can be traced back to “feoh” which is a derivative of the proto-Germanic “fehu”. Good. However, what we haven’t done is a good enough job of interpreting the originating culture’s concept of money for our contemporary age. Instead, we’ve tried to glom some quasi-supported esoteric “creative energy in the multiverse” meaning to fehu which doesn’t make any sense. That’s the equivalent of saying that the concept of mobile property, money, cattle, etc. brought to mind the creative energy of the multiverse to a 7th century godi. Seriously? Since when does the power to barter bring to mind a mythological creation of time?

What I’m advocating is not a cease and desist on meditative practices or individual understanding of runes. I’m advocating an increase in intensity the anthropological/sociological research into the cultures who used the runes in order to understand how they applied to them. By doing so, we can then use our meditative practices to interpret their meaning to us in the 21st century.

I’m referring specifically to Edred Thorsson’s book “Futhark” and the website runesecrets.com. I have a copy of Thorsson’s book and have perused RuneSecrets. While I don’t hold any ill will towards either site — there is good information within both — I tend to have more faith in the approach of the Rune Net group. A tempered and historically-driven search for evidence of mystical meaning that is then backed by the meditative findings of the individual. That’s all I ask.

Filed under: runes,thoughts — Tags: , , , — Sabin @ 09:44

February 2, 2010

Vote your Voice!

If you’ve come by these pages a lot, you’ll know that I’ve spent a good deal of time discussing various points on the state of our republic here in the U.S. Throughout, I have always maintained that a stronger voter turnout could go a long way towards correcting some of the trends we’ve been seeing magnified lately: corporatization of government, disenfranchisement, increased lobbyist control, career politicians. I truly believe with the utmost optimism that those ills of our government can be either corrected or slowed if more citizens would just vote in every election.

Why do I believe this? Because that’s how our system works. The more people who vote, the more government truly represents the voice of our entire country as opposed to just a few sects of angry factions.

I created a group called Vote Your Voice in order to try and spread my optimism on these issues.  The sole purpose of the group is to spread the word that increased voting numbers are tantamount to an improved government.

It’s going to be a tough road and one that will require all of us involved to maintain a spirit of possibility and optimism in the face of naysayers, ne’er-do-wells, and counter-arguments. I will do my part by continuing to be loud, optimistic, and paint pictures of the voting numbers so that the disparities can be seen. What I’m asking for is your support.

Join the group over on Facebook, participate in the commentary discussions on the website, or just get your own circle of influence to go vote whenever the opportunity arises.

Voting is not a privilege. It’s not a right. Voting is a duty of all U.S. citizens and should be taken seriously.

Filed under: democracy,politics,thoughts,voting — Tags: , , — Sabin @ 09:39

January 19, 2010

Voting accomplished, conscience muddy

Well, I voted. I braved the rain, the cold slush, and all of everything else today to cast my vote for the person who I feel is less likely to destroy our country in the future. Neither Martha Coakley nor Scott Brown appealed to me as an ideal candidate for a state senator. Joe Kennedy just was never an option for me.

So given the field, Coakley was it. If anything, I hope that replacing a democrat with a democrat does less damage than the other way around, because I’m sure it won’t do as much good as I want it to.

All three of the candidates claimed to be the answer to the “status quo”. And they are, depending on what you define as “status quo”. My definition is such that nothing short of a complete changing of the guard on capital hill can provide the answer. The only way to get our country back on track is to remove every politician on the take from office and then remove all lobbyists. The only way is to change the platforms of both major parties. To allow third parties a fair chance at winning. To get the citizenry of this country to participate in the process and reduce the power of factions.

Will either Brown or Coakley help us accomplish any of that? Probably not. I figured, though, that a former attorney general is far less bribeable than a man who posed for Playgirl, so she was the safer bet for me.

Filed under: democracy,politics,thoughts,voting — Tags: , , , , , — Sabin @ 19:14

January 17, 2010

Tuesday’s election not just about health care

So on Tuesday, we’ve got a special election here in Massachusetts to fill the senate seat left by the late Ted Kennedy. Naturally, the primary candidates for the seat are a Republican — Scott Brown — and a Democrat — Martha Coakley. I’m very torn as to how I’m going to vote. Without revealing too much, here’s my dilemma.

We’re told that this vote will determine the balance of the senate and — consequently — the success potential of the current health care legislation being considered in the two houses. Voting Coakley is, we’re told, a vote for the current health care legislation and voting for Brown would logically be a vote against it. The trouble is, I don’t agree with some primary items within the health care legislation, so this election for me is more about ideologies going beyond this particular piece of legislation.

Do I send in someone who will maintain the status quo of the current Democratic platform and continue moving things in the direction that they’re going, which is not necessarily a good thing? Or do I send in someone who will attempt to override the status quo with a different kind of status quo that is what I feel the country is trying to run from.

Whatever I end up deciding, please try and see that this upcoming special election is not just about health care — no matter how many well-written radio ads may tell you otherwise.

This is an election about personal liberties, responses to terrorist plots, the war in Afghanistan, the FED, and everything else that is plaguing the country at this point. The health care bill as written does nothing but ensure that health insurance companies will always have customers. Period. No matter what other reforms are within the x-thousand pages of that document, it forces every american to have health insurance. Mandates under penalty of law that we all purchase insurance from some gigantic corporation. Reform? Maybe. Maybe not.

In the long term, there are many other issues at hand than this year’s particular bill, and those are things we need to think about when casting our vote on Tuesday. How will Brown and/or Coakley handle the approvals of a supreme court justice? Potential impeachment? Future bills on domestic security? Vote your conscience, vote your voice.

Filed under: democracy,politics,voting — Tags: , , , , , — Sabin @ 11:36

Older Posts »

here it is.
TikiTikiTiki.
copyleft. 1996 - 2010 Sabin Densmore send some mail.